987.400 Interactions of Symmetries: Secondary Greatcircle Sets 
987.410 Icosa Phase of Rationality 
Fig. 987.412 
987.412 For an illustration of how the four VE great circles of 60degree central angles subdivide the centralangle chord increments, see Fig. 987.412. 
987.413
Next recalling the jitterbug transformation of the
VE into the icosa with its
inherent incommensurability brought about by the
2:sqrt(2) = sqrt(2):1
transformation ratio, and recognizing that the transformation
was experimentally
demonstrable by the constantly symmetrical contracting
jitterbugging, we proceed to
fractionate the icosahedron by the successive l5 great
circles, six great circles (icosa type),
and 10 great circles whose selffractionation produces
the S Modules^{8} as well as the T and
E Modules.
(Footnote 8: See Sec. 988.) 
987.416 The 120 right triangles, evenly grouped into 30 spherical diamonds, are transformed into 30 planar diamonds of central angles identical to those of the 30 spherical diamonds of the 15 great circles of the icosa. When the radius to the center of the face of the rhombic triacontahedron equals 0.9994833324.... of the unit vector radius of Synergetics (1.000), the rhombic triacontahedron has a tetravolume of 5 and each of its 120 T Quanta Modules has a volume of one A Module. When the radius equals 1, the volume of the rhombic triacontahedron is slightly larger (5.007758029), and the corresponding E Module has a volume of 1.001551606 of the A Module. (See Sec. 986.540) 
988.00 Icosahedron and Octahedron: S Quanta Module
988.100 Octaicosa Matrix 
Fig. 988.00 Fig. 988.100 
988.110 The icosahedron positioned in the octahedron describes the S Quanta Modules. (See Fig. 988.100.) Other references to the S Quanta Modules may be found at Secs. 100.105, 100.322, Table 987.121, and 987.413. 
988.111 As skewed off the octaicosa matrix, they are the volumetric counterpart of the A and B Quanta Modules as manifest in the nonnucleated icosahedron. They also correspond to the 1/120th tetrahedron of which the triacontahedron is composed. For their foldable angles and edgelength ratios see Figs. 988.111AB. 
Fig. 988.12 
988.12 The icosahedron inscribed within the octahedron is shown at Fig. 988.12. 
Fig. 988.13A Fig. 988.13B Fig. 988.13C 
988.13 The edge lengths of the S Quanta Module are shown at Fig. 988.13A. 
988.14 The angles and foldability of the S Quanta Module are shown at Fig. 988.13B. 
990.00 Triangular and Tetrahedral Accounting
Fig. 990.01 
990.01 All scientists as yet say "X squared," when they encounter the expression "X^{2}," and "X cubed," when they encounter "X^{3}" But the number of squares enclosed by equimoduleedged subdivisions of large gridded squares is the same as the number of triangles enclosed by equimoduleedged subdivisions of large gridded triangles. This remains true regardless of the grid frequency, except that the triangular grids take up less space. Thus we may say "triangling" instead of "squaring" and arrive at identical arithmetic results, but with more economical geometrical and spatial results. (See Illus. 990.01 and also 415.23.) 
990.02 Corresponding large, symmetrical agglomerations of cubes or tetrahedra of equimodular subdivisions of their edges or faces demonstrate the same rate of thirdpower progression in their symmetrical growth (1, 8, 27, 64, etc.). This is also true when divided into small tetrahedral components for each large tetrahedron or in terms of small cubical components of each large cube. So we may also say "tetrahedroning" instead of "cubing" with the same arithmetical but more economical geometrical and spatial results. 
990.03 We may now say "one to the second power equals one," and identify that arithmetic with the triangle as the geometrical unit. Two to the second power equals four: four triangles. And nine triangles and 16 triangles, and so forth. Nature needs only triangles to identify arithmetical "powering" for the selfmultiplication of numbers. Every square consists of two triangles. Therefore, "triangling" is twice as efficient as "squaring." This is what nature does because the triangle is the only structure. If we wish to learn how nature always operates in the most economical ways, we must give up "squaring" and learn to say "triangling," or use the more generalized "powering." 
990.04 There is another very trustworthy characteristic of synergetic accounting. If we prospectively look at any quadrilateral figure that does not have equal edges, and if we bisect and interconnect those midedges, we always produce four dissimilar quadrangles. But when we bisect and interconnect the midedges of any arbitrary triangle^{__}equilateral, isosceles, or scalene^{__}four smaller similar and equisized triangles will always result. There is no way we can either bisect or uniformly subdivide and then interconnect all the edge division points of any symmetrical or asymmetrical triangle and not come out with omni identical triangular subdivisions. There is no way we can uniformly subdivide and interconnect the edge division points of any asymmetrical quadrangle (or any other differentedgelength polygons) and produce omnisimilar polygonal subdivisions. Triangling is not only more economical; it is always reliable. These characteristics are not available in quadrangular or orthogonal accounting. 
990.05 The increasingly vast, comprehensive, and rational order of arithmetical, geometrical, and vectorial coordination that we recognize as synergetics can reduce the dichotomy, the chasm between the sciences and the humanities, which occurred in the midnineteenth century when science gave up models because the generalized case of exclusively threedimensional models did not seem to accommodate the scientists' energy experiment discoveries. Now we suddenly find elegant field modelability and conceptuality returning. We have learned that all local systems are conceptual. Because science had a fixation on the "square," the "cube," and the 90degree angle as the exclusive forms of "unity," most of its constants are irrational. This is only because they entered nature's structural system by the wrong portal. If we use the cube as volumetric unity, the tetrahedron and octahedron have irrational number volumes. 
995.00 Vector Models of Magic Numbers
995.01 Magic Numbers 
995.02 The magic numbers are the high abundance points in the atomicisotope occurrences. They are 2, 8, 20, 50, 82, 126, ..., ! For every nonpolar vertex, there are three vector edges in every triangulated structural system. The Magic Numbers are the nonpolar vertexes. (See Illus. 995.31.) 
Fig. 995.03 Fig. 995.03A 
995.03 In the structure of atomic nuclei, the Magic Numbers of neutrons and protons correspond to the states of increased stability. Synergetics provides a symmetrical, vectormodel system to account for the Magic Numbers based on combinations of the three omnitriangulated structures: tetrahedron, octahedron, and icosahedron. In this model system, all the vectors have the value of onethird. The Magic Numbers of the atomic nuclei are accounted for by summing up the total number of external and internal vectors in each set of successive frequency models, then dividing the total by three, there being three vectors in Universe for every nonpolar vertex. 
995.10 Sequence 
995.11A
The sequence is as follows:

995.11
The sequence is as follows:

995.12 Magic Number 28: The Magic Number 28, which introduces the cube and the octahedron to the series, was inadvertently omitted from Synergetics 1. The three frequency tetrahedron is surrounded by an enlarged twofrequency tetrahedron that shows as an outside frame. This is a negative tetrahedron shown in its halo aspect because it is the last case to have no nucleus. The positive and negative tetrahedra combine to provide the eight corner points for the triangulated cube. The outside frame also provides for an octahedron in the middle. (See revised Figs. 995.03A and 995.31A.) 
995.20 Counting 
995.21 In the illustration, the tetrahedra are shown as opaque. Nevertheless, all the internal vectors defined by the isotropic vector matrix are counted in addition to the vectors visible on the external faces of the tetrahedra. 
995.30 Reverse Peaks in Descending Isotope Curve 
Fig. 995.31 Fig. 995.31A 
995.31 There emerges an impressive pattern of regularly positioned behaviors of the relative abundances of isotopes of all the known atoms of the known Universe. Looking like a picture of a mountainside ski run in which there are a series of skijump upturns of the run, there is a series of sharp upwardpointing peaks in the overall descent of this relative abundance of isotopes curve, which originates at its highest abundance in the lowestatomicnumbered elemental isotopes. 
995.32 The Magic Number peaks are approximately congruent with the atoms of highest structural stability. Since the lowest order of number of isotopes are the most abundant, the inventory reveals a reverse peak in the otherwise descending curve of relative abundance. 
995.33 The vectorial modeling of synergetics demonstrates nuclear physics with lucid comprehension and insight into what had been heretofore only instrumentally apprehended phenomena. In the postfission decades of the atomicnucleus explorations, with the giant atom smashers and the ever more powerful instrumental differentiation and quantation of stellar physics by astrophysicists, the confirming evidence accumulates. 
995.34 Dr. Linus Pauling has found and published his spheroid clusters designed to accommodate the Magic Number series in a logical system. We find him^{__}although without powerful synergetic tools^{__}in the vicinity of the answer. But we can now identify these numbers in an absolute synergetic hierarchy, which must transcend any derogatory suggestion of pure coincidence alone, for the coincidence occurs with mathematical regularity, symmetry, and a structural logic that identifies it elegantly as the model for the Magic Numbers. 
Next Chapter: 1000.00 